Thursday, October 6, 2011

Protests, Palin, and Polls


I'm sure all of us have had the Occupy Wall Street movement drummed into our heads over the past few weeks. Not that I mind the news media giving popular movements coverage. That's a good thing. There seems to be a wide range of people who are participating in the protests, from anarchists to democrats who just think government should give them more money. The people I especially don't understand--and the ones who seem to be most vocal on the movement's website--are the ones who are upset about their student loans and how evil Wall Street is because those evil corporatists don't pay taxes.

To the first, I would simply say that your choices are yours to make and yours to live with. You decided to go to college, with the idea that it would help you get a job. It obviously didn't, and now you're saddled with mountains of college debt that you have no way of paying off. Welcome to reality, where government doesn't pay for your shoddy decisions.

The second has a bit more justification, because the men who work on Wall Street are sometimes the ones who try to get out of every tax they can in quest of profits. I see this more as a commentary on the stifling nature of our tax code, and how easy it is to buy off the IRS, more than anything else. Should our politics and our money be separate? Sure. Will it happen anytime in the next six thousand years? Probably not. Six thousand years of past human civilization couldn't figure out how to wrest the two apart, and I have no delusions that our highly advanced technology will figure out a way for us to do it.

Of course, being the borderline anarchist that I am, I think our tax code is broken, period, and needs to be completely scrapped and rewritten, preferably in a way that will take up no more then ten printed pages and will be easy for the regular person to read. Hey, I'm allowed to be lazy with my citizenship. But once again, that's not going to happen anytime soon, because the IRS is far too lucrative an agency to be so curbed.

I identify far more with the protesters who are there for causes like ending the wars, or protesting the fact that our government is basically owned by the Chinese one because we owe so much money to them. Or even the people who are protesting the fact that corporate sponsors make up so much of the money given to our politicians (I'm still wondering why Rick Perry needs a whopping $17 million to prosecute his campaign...especially when Ron Paul is doing far better, and has only raised $12.5 million since he entered the race. I'm also wondering why people are still giving that shill money. But I digress). But, then again, as I said above, there's no way we're going to separate the two.


Sarah Palin announced yesterday that she wouldn't be making a bid for the job of Spender in Chief. Democrats are disappointed, because their easy victory won't be quite as easy as they'd hoped, Palinites are mad/sad/in the depths of despair, and the rest of us are just happy we won't actually have to put up with her for the next thirteen months unless we are masochistic enough as to turn on Fox News.

I'm really not all that surprised by the move. She enjoys her role as media darling far too much to give it up for actual campaigning, and she knows she has more power as a pundit than she would as a prospective candidate for the highest office in the land. Mostly because she'd never get elected, and I do hope she knows it.


With Barack Obama's approval rating down near 42% and his Rasmussen approval index at -24--again--I think it's safe to say that people don't really like him much. And it's not just our Democrat president, but also our Republican Congress that is drawing the ire of voters. According to a recent poll, only 14% approve of Congress' handling of recent business.

Not that Congress really seems to care. To individual congressmen, all that matters is that their individual popularity remains stable. And judging from my experience, that hasn't changed much. People in my district may not be fans of Congress, but they love Mac Thornberry, our valiant Republican knight who votes for bailouts and doesn't know the first thing about the Constitution, judging by his rhetoric. So individual congressmen get reelected, and Congress doesn't change, since people apparently don't realize that if you don't like what they're doing, it might be time to put new blood in there.

After all, it can't be our elected representatives who are statist curs. It's other people's representatives who do such terrible things.


Megan said...

You pretty much rock! ;)

You know what got me, is that on a number of poll sites, even without Palin officially running, they still had her polling numbers right in there with Perry, Bachmann, Romney, Paul...all the ones who WERE running! I think maybe it was just the media's way of trying to nudge her to run. Unfortunately, her numbers were so low that even if she did run, I doubt it would have made a difference - she still wouldn't have run, and would probably have continued to make herself look ridiculous.

I'm just jazzed that in the past poll(s) (I think I saw more than one, but it may only have been one....can't remember...) that did a head-to-head between Ron Paul and President Obama, Paul beat him out! As opposed to almost everyone else running, including Romney! I just wish more people would vote for Ron Paul and actually give that outcome a chance of happening!

And I love how you called yourself a "borderline anarchist." It made me chuckle because I was accused of that just the other day, and oddly, it didn't really bother me. :P

Megan said...

Oops... That should say, "still wouldn't have won," not run.

Teresa said...

Palin brings a populist message to the arena, a challenge to the status quo and I think that is great. We won't know now, but since at least one poll showed her 5 points behind him Obama it is more probable than not that she would have trounced Obama in the election because she speaks for much of the populace today. She made the decision not to run so that she could be with her family.

The tax code definitely needs to be scrapped. I don't know whether either the Fair Tax or Flat Tax is the answer but it seems like one or the other would be a step in the right direction. I personally like the Fair Tax.

Liberty said...

@Megan- I agree with everything you posted. XD

@Teresa- I don't think that Mrs. Palin speaks for much of the populace. She's considered as a bit of a countrified child by most people, I think, mostly because her grasp of history and politics seems to be very shaky. But she isn't running, and as I think Dr. Paul has far more popular support (judging by his poll numbers), I'll continue to support him. :D